I commonly hear people claim that "blogging is dead" but I disagree. Yes, short-form video is eating the world and our attention spans have taken a direct hit, but long-form blogging is alive and well. The growth of the small web movement continues, and the rise of Substack is another case in point, but it's not all good news. There are too many forces pulling us away from focusing on the writing.
Substack has been a major force in the blogging resurgence. It has generally been a good internet citizen (technically speaking, not necessarily from a content moderation point of view depending on your political view) – it supports RSS, and when viewing posts the only pop up is a single "subscribe" box that's easily dismissed. It offers a clean UI on all platforms and it's easy to use, so I'm told. Yet it's becoming clear they're trying to increase 'engagement' by turning it into yet another social media site, so the inevitable enshittification appears to be already in full swing. More distractions, less writing.
We can get a glimpse of the future of Substack by looking at how this has played out with VC-fuelled publishing platforms in the past. Like Substack, Medium began as a free and simple way to publish long-form writing online (it was created by Twitter co-founder Evan Willams). Medium offered a nice editor and published pages were minimal and largely distraction free. It is backed by heavyweight VCs and has raised $163 million to date, yet despite having 1 million members (paying $50/yr) it's still barely profitable and those VCs are going to want their unicorn exit somehow, soon enough. So, of course, the platform has become increasingly user-hostile as the dark patterns have arrived, such as jailing content through forced registration, paywalls, incessant nagging through pop-ups and ditching support for custom domains. Profits are likely up, but the reader experience has been bludgeoned. Enshittification, again.
It's only a matter of time before we see the same happen with Substack. VCs gotta get paid, and they'll do whatever it takes to get that return – customers be damned. It's now describing itself as "a new media app that connects you with the creators, ideas, and communities you care about most". A befuddling word salad that essentially means they're now a social media company. As John Gruber says, "consider Substack last, not first". Yup.
These products are first and foremost about building an audience, not about quality writing. They offer the blogging basics and they do it well, of course, but their focus is on recommendation algorithms and viral loops that overwhelm you with new content to get you to 'engage' more because this is how they make money. You choose Substack (or Medium) because it's everywhere and you're led to believe it's a great home for your writing which will get you more "distribution" from the flywheel effect. I'd argue that, on the contrary, you're actually putting yourself at the behest of an algorithm, competing with slop, and being overwhelmed with unnecessary distractions. Some blogs will undoubtably benefit, but it's more likely that a blog will get lost in the noise than go viral. Your readers will eventually disengage as the pop-ups, ads and tracking makes all your hard work unreadable. You'll give up writing, your blog will go stale and that's a real shame.
Much of this is what drives me to run my own publishing/blogging platform, Pagecord (the home of this blog). A big draw for me is undoubtably the technical challenge of it all which this old CTO really enjoys, not gonna lie, but I love writing, blogging and my perfect platform didn't exist so I thought I'd try and create it.
In many ways Pagecord is similar to other popular indie products, but its core tenets are:
-
Making it as easy as possible to write: simple/minimal, with few distractions, offering alternative ways to compose and publish (web, email, Obsidian).
-
Making it as enjoyable as possible to read: everything should be super-fast, privacy respecting, with lovely typography, and it should look great on all devices.
Pagecord does have an "audience" feature that allows readers to subscribe to blogs by email, but this is to make it easy for readers to follow blogs, which is still harder than it should be for non-techies who don't know about RSS. It also has theme customisation options (colours, fonts, even custom CSS) which you could argue distracts people from writing, but this is a feature people really love – they want to customise their home on the web, not be forced to live in a design monoculture where every blog looks the same. It's important we do what we can to escape the age of average.
I understand that distribution matters. It's more rewarding when you're not screaming into the void, but distribution is possible with a standalone website when you're writing quality content and your blog is SEO-friendly. People will shared that content, search engines (and, yes, AI) will find it. If your writing isn't good, no Substack or Medium algorithm will save you.
So the old cliche still rings true – focus on your writing. Don't overthink it. Forget about distribution, building an audience, your follower count. Unless you're trying to monetise your blog (totally legit reason) it doesn't matter. It's just another distraction in your head, in a world that's drowning in them.
Don't think you have to use big tech to have writing success. Choose a platform where you’re not the product, one that gets out of your way rather than demands your attention. Write what you want to write about, not what you think others want to read, and certainly not what you think the algorithm will like.